• Fiat, Guangzhou finalize plan to build Jeep SUVs in China

    August 23, 2013
    Following lengthy negotiations, Fiat and joint venture partner Guangzhou Automobile Group have reached an agreement concerning a location for Jeep production in China.

     
    The two automakers will build Jeeps at their jointly operated plant in the central China city of Changsha, according to an Automotive News report citing Chinese media sources.

     

    Jeep, which in 1983 became first western brand to assemble vehicles in China, has long angled to resume production in the world’s largest new car market. Local assembly would allow Jeep ti sidestep the hefty import tariffs that currently force its prices upward and limit sales.

     

    But talks with Guangzhou, which began in 2011, have moved forward at a deliberate pace. In January, Jeep and its parent company, Fiat, negotiated a preliminary agreement with Guangzhou to build SUVs together in China, but a dispute over the production location had held up proceedings until now. An official accord is expected to be signed sometime over the next few months.

     

    In the past, Jeep CEO Mike Manley has suggested that the new Cherokee will likely be the first Jeep to be screwed together in China. Manley believes that the Cherokee could double Jeep’s Chinese volume, which totaled 46,000 units last year.


    Photo by Ronan Glon.

  • Chevrolet Corvette Stingray could receive stop-start tech

    August 23, 2013
    With a 29-mpg highway rating, the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray is a fairly efficient machine relative to its considerable underhood might. However, upcoming government fuel economy regulations may force General Motors to go back and find new ways to eke out even more mpgs from the 455-horsepower sports car.

     
    The addition of a stop-start system could become an unavoidable necessity down the road, much to the chagrin of the C7 development team, which initially rejected the technology as unsuitable for new Corvette.

     

    “It is more mass and more cost,” Tadge Juechter, Corvette chief engineer, told Edmunds. “It is very disconcerting to have your lively, great-sounding engine stall every time you come to a stop. The real customer value, the real environmental value is zero. So you are hauling around all that stuff to get a better label value (for mpg on the window sticker). It wasn’t worth it.”

     

    Juechter said that stop-start technology – which cuts the engine when at idle to reduce fuel consumption – would likely increase city mileage by around 2 mpg, although it would be defeatable for drivers who prefer a V8 soundtrack to silence at a stoplight.

     

    If adopted, stop-start technology would join the Corvette’s already-considerable arsenal of fuel-saving systems, including cylinder deactivation, direct injection and a seven-speed manual transmission.


    Photos by Andrew Ganz.

  • BMW creates virtual concept for Grand Turismo 6 [Video]

    August 23, 2013
    BMW has published a teaser sketch that previews the upcoming Vision Grand Turismo concept.  Eschewing major auto shows all around the world, the digital concept will make its public debut as downloadable content on Grand Turismo 6, a video game designed for the Playstation 3 console.


    The sketch depicts an aggressive-looking race car that borrows aerodynamic design cues such as its large rear wing and low front bumper from BMW’s DTM cars.  Although not based on a production model, the Vision Grand Turismo is reminiscent of both the i8 plug-in hybrid that will debut in Frankfurt next month and the retro-styled M1 Homage Concept that was presented at the Villa d’Este Concours d’Elegance a couple of years ago.

    Virtual technical details are not available, but the concept was designed to offer realistic handling and power at the tip of players’ fingers.


    More information about the concept will be available when Grand Turismo 6 is released on December 6th of this year.  Although BMW has not confirmed this, the concept was developed exclusively for the video game so it will not be built, let alone given the green light for production.


    Alpine, Peugeot, Alfa Romeo, Audi, Aston Martin, Infiniti, Volkswagen and Nissan are also designing downloadable concepts exclusively for the game.  

  • Review: 2013 Infiniti QX56 (QX80) 4WD

    August 23, 2013
    Defying all odds – a recession, rising fuel prices a general move toward crossovers – Infiniti has done rather well with its second-generation full-size SUV.


    On the face of things, the QX56 (which has been rechristened QX80 for 2014) seems diametrically opposed to what shoppers are looking to buy these days, especially considering it was introduced at the height of the recession.

    But solid demand for the QX56 has shown that there’s clearly a market for big, luxurious SUVs. And, after spending time in this thoroughly modern luxo-ute, we can see why.


    What is it?

    Sold overseas as the Nissan Patrol, the QX56 is a body-on-frame SUV designed to haul lots of passengers, their cargo and even a trailer in luxurious comfort. At over 208 inches from head to toe and tipping the scales at about 5,900 lbs., it’s longer and plumper than the Nissan Armada-based QX56 it replaced.


    Confusingly, Nissan has kept the old Armada around for buyers in North America.


    Arriving on the market for the 2011 model year, the QX56 has remained mostly unchanged. Under its bulbous hood is a 5.6-liter V8 that cranks out a solid 400 horsepower and 413 lb-ft. of torque. Power goes to either the rear wheels or, on our four-wheel-drive tester, each corner. Notably, the QX56′s all-wheel-drive system also includes a low range for off road use or for lugging heavy boats out of a body of water.


    All QX56s are well-equipped, but our tester was lavished with every available option to the point where its list price was within spitting range of $80,000. Notable tech included a hydraulic body motion control system to reduce lean in corners, a full complement of radar safety and convenience features and upsized 22-inch alloy wheels.


    What’s it up against?

    QX56′s natural rivals include the Mercedes-Benz GL550, the Lexus LX 570 and the Cadillac Escalade.


    What’s it look like?

    We’re hard pressed to call the QX56 attractive – it’s distinctive, certainly.


    Bulgy and rounded from every corner, the QX56 doesn’t really hide its girth well even when swathed in “slimming” black paint like our test car. And that’s a real problem considering it’s already larger than any of its competitors listed above.


    Its front fascia juts out like a swollen lip, while the rear end seems unnecessarily fussy. That said, while we’re not usually fans of oversized wheels, the QX56 actually looks better to our eyes with the optional 22s fitted to our tester. That’s something we never thought we’d say.


    And on the inside?

    Those grand dimensions pay off in terms of interior space. Even by big SUV standards, the QX56 is positively palatial. And we don’t just mean that because it’s roomy.


    Infiniti drivers will recognize the QX56′s vertical dashboard and simple infotainment system. Hardly overloaded with switches, the setup nonetheless provides convenient access to functions other automakers seem intent on forgetting – for example, there are six traditional preset buttons for the audio system and every climate control function can be accessed from a switch rather than a menu or two. That might sound old school, but in a world of increasingly complicated and distracting car dashboards, it’s a win by our count.


    The QX56 appeals inside for more than just its space and controls. Premium materials like gradient tinted wood trim and, as part of our tester’s $4,650 Deluxe Touring Package, semi-aniline leather seats give it a thoroughly upmarket feel. Only a relatively low-tech instrument cluster and the occasional piece of Nissan-sourced switchgear let it down.


    But does it go?

    Consider this one a case of numbers. Yes, 400 horsepower is a lot of power. But 5,900 lbs. is also a lot of mass. If it’s not clear to you by now that the QX56 is a hefty vehicle, consider this: It weighs as much as two Nissan Cubes conveniently stacked on top of one another.


    As a result, the QX56 is peppy but not overwhelmingly quick. Its seven-speed automatic gearbox does an admirable job of keeping the engine within its power band, but at the expense of fuel economy. Despite EPA ratings of 14/20 mpg (16 mpg combined), we saw as low as 12 mpg in the city and never higher than 18 mpg on the highway.


    Despite the dismal fuel economy, the QX56 proved to be a phenomenal road trip cruiser. Silent at interstate speeds, its fully independent suspension soaked up even the most rutted terrain we encountered.


    Our tester’s Technology Package added a full complement of radar-based safety and convenience aids – a blind spot monitor, a lane departure warning system (that even intervened to tug the QX56 back into place if we wandered into another lane) and a radar cruise control system capable of bringing the big ‘ute to a halt if it detected an impending low-speed impact.


    When the road turned twisty, the QX56 was remarkably composed thanks to our tester’s Hydraulic Body Control system, which uses cross-linked shock absorbers to counteract body lean. Cornering isn’t Porsche 911-flat, but it is a significantly lower drama affair than we’ve come to expect from big SUVs.


    Around town, the QX56′s proportions don’t make it the easiest vehicle to park, but Infiniti’s innovative around view camera system provides a birds-eye view through the center display. Combine that with a new-for-2013 moving object detection system that alerts drivers to, say, a biker pedaling in their direction, and the QX56 proved easier to lug around town than we expected.


    We didn’t hook up a trailer to our tester, but prior experience with QX56s have shown them to be excellent haulers up their 8,500 lbs. rating.


    Leftlane’s bottom line

    Don’t judge a book by its cover. The Infiniti QX56‘s appeal lies in the refined way it goes about its business.


    Like an executive jet for the road, this big luxury SUV is extraordinarily comfortable. We just wish it had a bit more of a Gulfstream look to it.


    2013 Infiniti QX56 4WD base price, $63,750. As tested, $78,140.

    Theater Package, $3,100; Technology Package, $3,000; Deluxe Touring Package, $4,650; Cargo mat, $200; 22-inch wheels, $2,450; Destination, $990.


    Photos by Andrew Ganz.

  • Official: GM’s Opel unveils Frankfurt-bound Monza concept

    August 23, 2013
    General Motors’ Opel division has published a full set of details about the Monza concept that will bow next month at the Frankfurt Motor Show.  The concept revives a storied nameplate used on a series of sports coupes from 1977 to 1986.  


    Like its predecessors, the Monza takes the form of a sleek, fastback-like coupe, but it breaks with the past with massive roof-hinged doors designed to provide unobstructed access to both rows of seats.  Visually, the Monza is characterized by a sculpted body, thin trim pieces that create an elegant silhouette and a generally futuristic appearance.

    The Monza’s interior uses state-of-the-art LED projection technology for the instrument cluster and the touch screen-based infotainment system, a nod to the original Monza that pioneered digital dashboard technology over thirty years ago.  Other highlights found in the cockpit include a highly-stylized dashboard, floor-mounted pedals and wood trim on the dash, the center console and the door panels.


    Stretching 184 inches long, the Monza uses an evolution of the plug-in hybrid drivetrain that powers the Chevrolet Volt and the Opel Ampera.  In order to lower CO2 emissions, the range extender is a natural gas-burning variant of the brand new 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine that will debut under the hood of the Adam city car over the next couple of months. Details about the car’s electric motor and battery pack were not provided.


    While the Monza hints at the design direction Opel / Vauxhall will take over the following decade, it will likely not be given the green light for production in the near future.  However, the LED dashboard technology will be applied to upcoming Opel products and the plug-in hybrid drivetrain hints at what could lurk under the hood of the next-generation Chevrolet Volt when it arrives as either a 2015 or a 2016 model.

  • German investors bidding for Fisker

    August 23, 2013
    A new report finds a German investment group called Fritz Nols AG has recently placed a bid for Fisker.  Largely funded by taxpayers, the failed startup hasn’t built a car in over a year and it laid off most of its work force last spring.


    Led by lawyer Ingo Voit, Frankfurt-based Fritz Nols AG is reportedly offering $25 million for the company and its assets, a small amount compared to the $171 million Fisker owes the United States Department of Energy (DOE).  

    Voit has closely studied Fisker’s case and he adamantly believes management issues caused the company’s demise.


    “Henrik Fisker put a huge emphasis on design but he forgot that he has to sell the car as well,” explained the lawyer in an interview with German magazine Autobild.  


    To return Fisker to profitability, the group of investors plans on shifting Karma production from Finland to the United States and sell about 2,500 cars year.  The company will quickly focus on expanding the lineup with the Surf, a shooting brake based on the Karma that bowed at the 2011 Frankfurt Motor Show, and the Sunset, a two-door convertible that debuted at the 2012 Detroit Motor Show.  Fritz Nols is not immediately planning on adding the smaller Atlantic to the Fisker lineup because it will be too expensive to produce.


    The DOE has not officially commented on the matter so when it will decide who takes home Fisker is not known.​  


    Fritz Nols is not the only company bidding for Fisker.  Last May, founder Henrik Fisker and Hong Kong-based investor Richard Li offered the United States Department of Energy (DOE) between $25 and $30 million for the company. China’s Wanxiang and Bob Lutz’s VL Automotive have teamed up with a bid of $20 million, and Beijing Automotive (BAIC) has also manifested an interest in purchasing the company for an undisclosed sum.

  • Tesla to adopt Tuosule name in China?

    August 23, 2013
    A new report finds Tesla Motors will adopt the Tuosule name in China because a trademark scammer registered the company’s name in 2006.


    The name Tuosule is a transliteration of Tesla in Cantonese Chinese, a dialect commonly spoken in Hong Kong.  Tesla recently opened a showroom and a repair center in Hong Kong and is expecting to deliver its first car there next spring.

    The California-based automaker is also building a flagship showroom located inside the Parkview Green hotel in Beijing.  Scheduled to open before the end of the year, the showroom will be the world’s largest Tesla dealership and will spearhead the firm’s Chinese expansion.


    Trademark Battle

    Baosheng Zhan protected the Tesla name in 2006 for use on cars, planes and boats.  Tesla tried to buy the trademark for two million yuan (roughly $326,000) but Zhan reportedly asked for ten times that amount, a sum that Tesla was not willing to pay.


    Tesla CEO Elon Musk initially planned on taking the matter to court but the legal battle would have been too lengthy and expensive.  Apple fought a similar battle when it tried to launch its iPad tablet in China and ended up paying $60 million to buy the name from a firm that had used it once on a product several years prior.  The lawsuit lasted two years.  


    The other trademark battle that Tesla was involved in ended relatively well as the Chinese swindler who had trademarked the name Tesla Motors a couple of years ago agreed to sell it for an unspecified amount of money last May.  This didn’t solve the firm’s naming problem as the trademark only applied to rail vehicles, sleighs, planes and boats.

  • VCD Auto-Umweltliste 2013/2014: Knauser-Könige

    August 23, 2013

    VCD-Umweltliste 2013/2014

    Der Verkehrsclub Deutschland (VCD) hat sich seit seiner Gründung 1986 dem Kampf für eine umweltgerechte Mobilität verschrieben. Beharrlich gibt der VCD schon seit etlichen Jahren eine Auto-Umweltliste heraus, die Autofahrern den Weg zu einem sparsamen und weniger umweltschädlichen Fahrzeug aufzeigen soll. Dafür hat man sich ein Punktesystem ausgedacht, das gar nicht so einfach zu durchschauen ist. In die Wertung fließen ein: CO2-Ausstoß (60 Prozent), Lärm (20), Belastung des Menschen durch Schadstoffe (15) und Belastung der Natur (5). Für jedes der Kapitel gibt es maximal 10 Punkte, aus allen Kapiteln wird am Ende die Gesamtnote gebildet.

    Für den CO2-Ausstoß wird der NEFZ zugrunde gelegt, beim Lärm das Fahrgeräusch, bei den Schadstoffen Partikel zu 50 und für NOx und NO2 zu je 25 Prozent. Die Wertung „Belastung der Natur“ wird wiederum durch die Menge an NOx bewertet.

    Die maximalen zehn Punkte in der CO2-Wertung gibt es aktuell bis 60 Gramm pro Kilometer. Für jedes Gramm mehr werden 0,0833 Punkte abgezogen. Für ein Fahrzeug mit einem CO2-Ausstoß von beispielsweise 100 g/km bleiben von zehn möglichen also nur 6,668 Punkte übrig. In der Lärmwertung bekommt ein Fahrzeug bis 65 dB(A) zehn Punkte, ab 75 dB(A) gar keinen mehr.

  • Klartext: Glücksgeburt in Russland

    August 23, 2013

    Nürburgring, GP-Strecke, in der ballistischen Bergab-Anflugskurve auf die Dunlop-Kehre. Leicht schwänzelnde Bremsung ins Eck, ein Gang runter, Pedal aufs Blech, rum. Jemand lacht. Ich glaube, ich. Das Fahrzeug ist ein BMW 1er M Coupé, der ohne eine Sekunde des Nachdenkens beste Viersitzer, den ich je gefahren bin. Das ist umso erstaunlicher, als ich sowohl den M3 und den M5 kurz vorher gefahren bin. Für beide wird man einen breiten Konsens für “bester Viersitzer” finden, aber einen Konsens ohne mich. Man fährt einen Viersitzer, weil der auch den Alltag können soll, also Bandbreite haben muss. Der M5 ist bestimmt besser auf der Autobahn. Aber wenn ich ein dort quasi lebender, entsprechend finanzkräftiger Vertreter wäre, würde ich für die Autobahn immer AMG-Benzen vorziehen. Auf kleinen Landstraßen ist der M5 ein Öltanker. Und der M3 ist ein wunderbares Auto. Er hat nur ein Problem: Der 1er M ist noch wunderbarer. Immer mal wieder in der Geschichte des Fahrzeugbaus kommt alles zusammen: die richtigen Leute, die richtigen Teile, die richtige Motivation, die richtige Zeit und das immer nötige Quäntchen Glück. Ich kann gut verstehen, dass BMW nur recht wenige 1Ms gebaut hat. Man hätte sich sonst wahrscheinlich in die M3-Verkäufe geschnitten.

    Probe aufs Exempel: anhalten, umsteigen. In einen M3 GTS, den schnellsten M3. Eigentlich ein unfairer Vergleich, denn der GTS hat ja nichtmal eine Rückbank. Tatsächlich ist nach spätestens 20 Metern klar, dass der GTS den 1er rundenzeitenmäßig schlachten würde wie eine Piñata. Tatsächlich ist jedoch auch nach spätestens 50 Metern klar, dass der 1er trotzdem selbst hier auf der Rennstrecke lustiger ist. Ich kann mich an kein Auto erinnern, dass mehr schwanzwedelnden Enthusiasmus vermittelt. Der 1M ist wie ein riesiger orangefarbener Labrador. Oh, zweiter Gang am Begrenzer! Das mach ich am liebsten. Oh, Hinterräder verrauchen! Das mach ich am liebsten. Oh, völlig gestört zu schnell ins Eck fahren und retten müssen! Das mach ich am liebsten. Einen aktuellen VW Golf GTI zu fahren ist im Vergleich dazu wie Opas Vorträge aus seinem Sparbuch zu ertragen.

    Ein Kollege bemerkte irgendwas mit “aber die Instrumentenkonsole ist weniger Premiumrhabarberrhabarber …” Ich hatte für ihn nur den mitleidsvollsten aller Blicke übrig. Wie leer muss eine Seele sein, um so einen Gedanken zu gebären? Solche Menschen schauen bei einem Labradorwelpen wahrscheinlich auch als erstes auf die Marke der Leine. Ich glaube, dass der 1er M in vielen Jahren noch eine strahlende Ikone des bayrischen Fahrzeugs sein wird, eins der wenigen gefragten Sammlerstücke aus dieser unserer Zeit. Es ist nach dem Fiat Panda Twinair erst das zweite Auto überhaupt, das ich wirklich gerne neu besessen hätte. Im Bus zurück zum Hotel schnappe ich mir ein geduldig aussehendes Ohr, um das mit 1M-Lob zu füllen, bis es blutet. “Das hört man doch gerne”, sagt ein Mund, der zu nicht direkt verbundenen, aber offenbar offenen Ohren gehört. “Dann kauf doch einen.” Es ist ein Pressemensch von BMW. Wie kann er nur! Ich empöre mich: “Ihr habt ja nur fünf gebaut und die sind alle längst verkauft!” Er lächelt ein gleichzeitig wissendes und gemeines Lächeln. “Oh, nein”, sagt er schließlich. “Ich weiß einen Ort in Russland, an dem es noch einen Neuen für dich gibt.”

    Seitdem ist viel Wasser die Isar runtergeflossen. Es gibt einen M135i, von dem viele sagen, er fahre “vergleichbar gut” wie der 1er M. Das interessiert mich nicht. In zwanzig Jahren werden Bayern-Experten das vielleicht noch wissen. Aber wollen werden sie den orangefarbenen Labrador, nicht das Auto mit dem Gesicht von Angela Merkel. Deshalb schweifen meine Gedanken immer noch immer wieder gen Russland. Herr Putin ist ja für mich ein lupenreiner Demokrat, so im Vergleich zu Frau Merkel. Das Land ist toll, ich liebe Oligarchen und Wodka im Winter. Und im Sommer. Und auf Arbeit mit Milch. Meine Bank sträubt sich noch, mein Projekt sicherheitenlos in bar zu finanzieren, aber ich denke, ich kann mindestens so gut schleimen wie Gérard Depardieu, und ich bin zuversichtlich, dass die Filiale einlenkt, wenn meine bestellten Gutachter mit ihren Kalaschnikows vorstellig werden. Vielleicht verstehen Sie das nicht. Dann sollten Sie gelegentlich ein BMW 1er M Coupé fahren. Wir sehen uns dann in Russland.